Citas
Aubrey, C. (1995). Teacher and Pupil Interactions and the Process of Mathematical Instruction in FourReception Classrooms over Children ́s First Year School. British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 21, No. 1,1995.
Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge Massachusetts. The Belknap Press ofHarvard University Press.
CEMIE, OEA, MEP. (1978). Análisis de Interacción. Manual II. Costa Rica. Ministerio de Educación Pública.
Chew, G. (1978). Análisis de Interacción. Costa Rica. Ministerio de Educación Pública.
Eggleston, J., Galton, M., and Jones, M. (1983). Teacher-pupil Interactions in Science Lessons: Explorationsand Theory. British Educational Research Journal, 9, p. 113.
Flanders, N. (1969). Classroom interaction pattens, pupil attitudes and achievement in the second,fourth, and sixth grades. Cooperative research project No. 5-1055. US Office of Education. Ann Arbor,University of Michigan, School of Education.
Galton, M., and Eggleston, J. (1979). Some Characteristics of Effective Science Teaching. EuropeanJournal of Science Education, Vol. 1, p. 75.
Hacker, R. (1984). A Typology of Approaches to Science Teaching. European Journal of ScienceEducation, Vol. 1, p. 75.
Harwood, D. (1989). The Nature of Teacher-Pupil Interaction in the Active Tutorial Work Approach:Using Interaction Analysis to Evaluate Student Centered Approaches. British Educational Research Journal, Vol.15, p.117.
Kyriacou, Ch. (1983). Research of Teacher Effectiveness in British Secondary School. BritishEducational Research Journal, Vol. 9, p. 60.
Rosenshine, B., and Furst, N. (1973). The Use of Direct Observation to Study Teaching, in: R.W.Travers (Editor). The Second Handbook of Research in Teaching. New York, Rand McNally.
Tatsuoka, M. (1988). Multivariate Analysis. New York, Macmillan Publishing Company.
Wilkinson, L. (1987). The System for Statistics. SYSTAT. Evanston, Ill.